VetriScience sells its gut-health line in two tiers, a single-strain chew and a seven-strain capsule marketed as Extra Strength, and the brand's own spec sheet on covetrus.com exists specifically to tell the two apart. CFU moves from 1 billion to 7.5 billion going up the line, but the more notable gap in this data runs the other way: the base Gut Health chew carries one canine RCT and two canine studies, while Extra Strength lists zero of either.
Not veterinary advice. Each claim above is backed by the label row or study linked in the full table below.
Stronger value rule: more strain-named organisms, CFU guaranteed through expiry over at-manufacture, and more canine RCTs each count as stronger. Raw CFU count alone never does.
Tagged from public posts mentioning either product. Counts, not opinions.
Strain count (1 vs 7), CFU (1B vs 7.5B), form (chew vs capsule), storage (shelf-stable vs fridge after opening), species_for (dog-only vs both dogs and cats), and canine research on record (1 RCT and 2 studies for the base chew, 0 and 0 for Extra Strength).
Not necessarily, and the research counts in this data actually point the other way. The base chew is the one with a canine RCT and study behind it; Extra Strength has none logged here despite the higher CFU number.
This fact pack doesn't cover combining them, and since they're the same brand's line at two different strain counts and doses, there's no documented basis for giving both rather than choosing one tier.